Saturday, June 27, 2020
Religion and Health Care Shouldnt Mixââ¬A Contraceptive Conundrum
  A good portion of what I do as a family practice Physician Assistant involves counseling women and men about birth control.  I have also gone to public schools and counseled junior high school students about puberty and sex.  One thing is for certain the answer to solving America's health care problems is definitely not placing restrictions or further boundaries on access to safe, effective contraception.  Of course right now in the news a big debate is raging over weather or not religious institutions should be required to provide family planning services. These are often the same religious institutions that aim to curb the ever rising rates of abortion. To me this seems backwards.  If I dont believe in smoking is the best way to curb the rising rates really by denying my patients a prescription for Chantix?  The Contraceptive Conundrum  Of the six million pregnancies that occur among American women each year, nearly half are unintended. As a result, American women experience 1.4 million unplanned births and 1.3 million abortions annually.  In 2007 The Alan Guttmacher Institute, which specializes in reproductive health issues, released a massive study showing that abortion rates rise and fall in synch with the availability of family planning services.  From the Guttmacher Institute's news release, its study, and the Washington Post report, we learn that states which fund programs to make family planning services widely accessible had lower rates of unplanned pregnancies -- and women having abortions.  In recent years, many states cut back on these programs, making poor women and girls more likely to have unintended pregnancies. Meanwhile, the religious right is aggressively campaigning both to end the availability of abortion and to limit access to contraception.  The United States has sky-high rates of unplanned pregnancies and abortions. As Guttmacher President Sharon L. Camp told the Washington Post, "Unintended pregnancy in the United States is twice as high as in most of Western Europe. As a direct result, abortion rates are twice or three times as high as European countries.  There is no reason why abortion rates need to be as high as they are.  At What Cost?  The direct medical costs of unintended pregnancies were US$9.4 billion in 2002.  Direct medical cost savings due to contraceptive use were US $12 billion.  National Cost of Teen Childbearing    Teen childbearing in the United States cost taxpayers (federal, state, and local) at least $10.9 billion in 2008, according to an updated analysis by The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Most of the costs of teen childbearing are associated with negative consequences for the children of teen mothers, including increased costs for health care, foster care, incarceration, and lost tax revenue.  Contraception, unsafe abortions and complicated pregnancies  The risk of a woman dying from pregnancy-related causes during her lifetime is about 1 in 4,800 in the USA and 1 in 17,400 in Sweden as compared to 1 in 7 in Niger.  Worldwide some 200 million women of childbearing age want to delay or avoid pregnancy, but 137 million use no method of contraception at all.  Every year, 190 million women become pregnant, at least a third of them unintentionally.  Nearly 50 million women resort to abortion every year, and 19 million are done under unsafe conditions. An estimated 68,000 women die each year as a result. Millions more suffer infections and other complications, such as infertility.  Family planning can prevent the serious health consequences of becoming pregnant  within six months of an abortion (anemia, membrane rupture, low-birth weight, preterm delivery).  Contraceptive use drastically reduces the chances of unintended pregnancy. Over the course of a year, only 8% of women using the pill will become pregnant, compared with 85% of sexually active women not using contraceptives.  This fact alone helps explain why the 7% of U.S. women at risk of unintended pregnancy who do not practice contraception account for almost half of the country's unintended pregnancies.          WOMEN IN NEED OF CONTRACEPTION, 2000      State  Overall, # in 000s  With public support      % of all  # in 000s      U.S. Total  33,983  48.2  16,396      Alabama  496  55.6  276      Alaska  72  44.4  32      Arizona  606  52.0  315      Arkansas  280  58.9  165      California  4,281  49.3  2,111      Colorado  537  42.6  229      Connecticut  438  36.8  161      Delaware  93  43.0  40      District of Columbia  85  48.2  41      Florida  1,699  49.9  848      Georgia  988  47.8  472      Hawaii  138  44.2  61      Idaho  141  56.7  80      Illinois  1,568  44.3  694      Indiana  735  48.6  357      Iowa  325  52.0  169      Kansas  309  50.8  157      Kentucky  442  54.3  240      Louisiana  520  59.4  309      Maine  152  52.0  79      Maryland  637  38.1  243      Massachusetts  880  38.0  334      Michigan  1,215  46.3  562      Minnesota  598  42.3  253      Mississippi  310  62.6  194      Missouri  665  51.4  342      Montana  89  61.8  55      Nebraska  197  51.8  102      Nevada  239  46.0  110      New Hampshire  158  39.9  63      New Jersey  1,101  35.9  395      New Mexico  207  61.4  127      New York  2,557  46.7  1,195      North Carolina  924  49.2  455      North Dakota  72  58.3  42      Ohio  1,369  48.1  658      Oklahoma  372  58.3  217      Oregon  390  50.5  197      Pennsylvania  1,528  46.8  715      Rhode Island  143  46.2  66      South Carolina  458  53.3  244      South Dakota  82  57.3  47      Tennessee  646  51.2  331      Texas  2,469  52.8  1,304      Utah  292  50.3  147      Vermont  72  52.8  38      Virginia  835  43.8  366      Washington  708  45.1  319      West Virginia  182  60.4  110      Wisconsin  634  46.4  294      Wyoming  51  56.9  29      Source: The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), Women in Need of Contraceptive Services and Supplies, 2000, AGI, 2003, www.guttmacher.org/pubs/win/index.html.          Some Final thoughts  I know there is a ton of data here. But I think it comes down to this. If the goal of the religious right is to save lives then they need to preserve access to contraception.  If conservatives want to save money and reduce taxes then they need to preserve access to contraception.  If conservatives want to protect the constitution then they need to remove a biased religious based judgment from medical decision making.  And this is why religion and health careshouldn'tmix!  You may also like -How Much Does it Cost to go to Physician Assistant (PA) School?So you are considering PA school?  Great, now how are you going to pay for it?  With the average undergraduate education debt prior to PA school at $36,300 and the average anticipateddebt load from PA school at $112,500 it's probably []2015 Physician Assistant Program Tuition and Cost Comparison Table  Updated 2015 Physician Assistant Program tuition and cost comparison table.  Tuition and cost data for resident andnonresidenttuition including length/duration of the PA program.  Based on this 2015 data table:  Average cost []Does PA Program Length Matter?  In a time long, long ago, just before the release of the first iPhone, I graduated from the UMDNJ (now Rutgers) PA program.  It was a three-year PA program with a nearly 100% PANCE pass rate. At the time, Rutgers was one of the best []    
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
